From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,52ec6426805daa89 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Received: by 10.68.12.68 with SMTP id w4mr374487pbb.18.1316590807320; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 00:40:07 -0700 (PDT) Path: lh7ni1674pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin3!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.internetdienste.de!noris.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:39:58 +0200 From: Georg Bauhaus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada is on the rise! References: <4e608ed3$0$303$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <9dsljaF5neU1@mid.individual.net> In-Reply-To: <9dsljaF5neU1@mid.individual.net> Message-ID: <4e7994ce$0$7617$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 Sep 2011 09:39:58 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 9f31032a.newsspool1.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=]7B83dbbSZUV0Pe9PRnbJ\ic==]BZ:af^4Fo<]lROoRQ<`=YMgDjhgRZ4`Yna[0]:^PCY\c7>ejVX6EX_aH6[McQ[W@iNhQeFbV X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18061 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: 2011-09-21T09:39:58+02:00 List-Id: On 21.09.11 01:23, George wrote: > Am Fri, 02 Sep 2011 10:07:47 +0200 schrieb Thomas Løcke: > >> http://lang-index.sourceforge.net/ >> >> The September 2011 update of the Transparent Language Popularity Index >> shows Ada sitting at a comfortable 0.999% in the "any" category, and a >> whooping 1.523% in the "general-purpose" category, meaning we've finally >> managed to edge our way past Pascal. YAY! >> > Can you tell me what the advantges of using Ada are compared to other > modern languages like Java and C#? A bit off-topic: all languages aren't really modern in that they show new kinds of programming expressions or provide for new ways of programming multicore hardware easily etc. Java and C# are statistically more fashionable, though, which might be important insofar as it is wise to dress according to the current trend. Note also that that Google is not only publicly favoring the languages Python, Java, JavaScript, and Go (and C for kernels, C++ only for system/network software IIUC), they also develop two of these languages, Python and Go, having hired their chief architects, They have built their flavor of virtual machine for "Mobile Phone Java". Go is pretty much an iteration of languages developed with the Plan 9 project at Bell labs during the 1990s. Advantages of languages are typically measured by project leads' preferences, hence it is not usually important to compare technical qualities at any level of detail.