From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,115bda8caeda5fa4
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.62.35 with SMTP id v3mr708620pbr.32.1315932895043;
        Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 m9ni5493pbd.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!news.musoftware.de!wum.musoftware.de!news.weisnix.org!newsfeed.ision.net!newsfeed2.easynews.net!ision!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:54:53 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6;
 rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Does GNAT support a thread-free RTS?
References: <m2sjo44e8r.fsf@pushface.org> <m2fwk04zet.fsf@pushface.org>
 <4e6f24c4$0$7629$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <fsqw02e0of5u.1lap7deczs8$.dlg@40tude.net>
In-Reply-To: <fsqw02e0of5u.1lap7deczs8$.dlg@40tude.net>
Message-ID: <4e6f8ade$0$7620$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 13 Sep 2011 18:54:54 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 96915eab.newsspool1.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=>_HFHnXXN8Yf8j24CD<3lPic==]BZ:af^4Fo<]lROoRQ<`=YMgDjhgRdMS0GUMGbMWnc\616M64>ZLh>_cHTX3j]iJGK8PXcD_\
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17948
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2011-09-13T18:54:54+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 13.09.11 14:18, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:

> Protected objects are not tagged, you need inheritance to provide typed
> channels. You meed multiple dispatch to handle channel-type + value-type
> hierarchies. You need entries returning indefinite values. You need MI to
> have handles to the channels/devices implementing the interface of a
> protected object.

Is there an AI on "limited holders"?