From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,826cd690cb6a7585
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!feed-C.news.volia.net!volia.net!news2.volia.net!feed-A.news.volia.net!newsfeed.utanet.at!feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 22:33:52 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6;
 rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: The simple Image issue
References: <m2mxerfai2.fsf@pushface.org> <j3iv3s$id4$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <904e717e-da4c-46c9-bbc2-4bae8368d459@l4g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>
 <4e5d139f$0$6575$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <3756bc0c-d938-4b45-baa1-b80e59d58055@a10g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
 <1a879va9fjuwo.1r1b6vbp45lx5.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4e5dd1c1$0$6638$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <97f6c755-d7da-4bd8-972e-efaa20b7c016@a10g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <97f6c755-d7da-4bd8-972e-efaa20b7c016@a10g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4e5e9aaf$0$7610$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 31 Aug 2011 22:33:52 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 06f8d1eb.newsspool1.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=ZbPeNVm1>W>L2C_`koXfC5ic==]BZ:af>4Fo<]lROoR1<`=YMgDjhg2[lUC1AFhcn3PCY\c7>ejV8:Djn3kdmQQ<XSnG0U8?D;>
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:21770
Date: 2011-08-31T22:33:52+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 31.08.11 18:08, Adam Beneschan wrote:
> On Aug 30, 11:16 pm, Georg Bauhaus<rm.dash-bauh...@futureapps.de>
> wrote:
>
>>> The most annoying is that you have to specify the [sub]type T'Image(X). It
>>> should have been X'Image or Image(X).
>>
>> In which way would you change T'Value for symmetry?
>
> I think if we wanted symmetry, we'd rename 'Value to X'Egami.  Or
> maybe X'egamI?  egamI'X?  I think Hyman is right on this one.

Yes, symmetry is false along several axes.  Point taken along
these.  I do notice the several Egs.