From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bc2c82b1e5c6fe83
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.68.221.4 with SMTP id qa4mr11486384pbc.7.1330350592759;
        Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:49:52 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 h9ni15317pbe.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!q12g2000yqg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Mark Lorenzen <mark.lorenzen@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Question about out parameters of unconstrained array type.
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:48:30 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <4e2c786f-8485-436f-b9c5-c8c19cf00805@q12g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>
References: <I8qdndMrnK9zZtXS4p2dnAA@giganews.com>
 <MPG.29b336d065dea044989689@news.zen.co.uk>
 <m2obsmk7hl.fsf@pushface.org> <MPG.29b37490d1cb99be98968a@news.zen.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.163.1.105
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1330350592 370 127.0.0.1 (27 Feb 2012 13:49:52
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:49:52 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: q12g2000yqg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=193.163.1.105;
 posting-account=Srm5lQoAAAAEMX9rv2ilEKR6FDPapmSq
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client: true
X-Google-Header-Order: HUALENKRC
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1;
 rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/10.0.2,gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: 2012-02-27T05:48:30-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 25 Feb., 23:44, Phil Thornley <phil.jpthorn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Would SPARK accept
>
> > =A0 =A0for I in S'Range loop
>
> > ?
>
> No - the subtype of the loop index is still regarded as anonymous.

Phil

Do you know the rationale for this? Why can't the examiner just
generate hypotheses like

loop__1__i <=3D s__index__subtype__1__last
loop__1__i >=3D s__index__subtype__1__first

and then generate appropriate hypotheses regarding
s__index__subtype__1__last and s__index__subtype__1__first?

Regards

Mark L