From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c08aa0f01f894da6
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!fdn.fr!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:38:44 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110613 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GPUs and CUDA
References: 
 <09ad3bbb-b0a3-438b-9263-b2cb49098e5c@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com>
 <iv8381$l44$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <bf681a4d-d0d1-4bcc-95b4-b336fe469009@ct4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <bf681a4d-d0d1-4bcc-95b4-b336fe469009@ct4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4e1b4333$0$6583$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Jul 2011 20:38:43 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: d3d957ef.newsspool3.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=J17;aFJ:mBe]BlmkiiU@BiMcF=Q^Z^V3h4Fo<]lROoRa8kF<OcfhCOk04[3RTi>fNfPCY\c7>ejVhm^]6;9I0A<di9F>>gbQcH`
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:21139
Date: 2011-07-11T20:38:43+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 7/11/11 7:45 PM, Anatoly Chernyshev wrote:

> Well, the most attractive application of CUDA is not the graphics, but
> parallel computing using modern graphic chips. The performance gain
> for the parallelizable programs, which can use CUDA, is pretty
> significant on a PC. I was looking into using it myself, and eagerly
> waiting when somebody comes up with the Ada binding.

Wouldn't a multicore PC with additional Graphics processors be
a candidate for an Ada 2012 Ravenscar multicore runtime?