From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c4cb2c432feebd9d
X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,c4cb2c432feebd9d
X-Google-Thread: 101deb,15c6ed4b761968e6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid1094ba,gid101deb,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Vorbr=FCggen?= <jvorbrueggen@not-mediasec.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.pl1
Subject: Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 13:46:03 +0200
Organization: MediaSec Technologies GmbH
Message-ID: <4e056pF1beijbU1@individual.net>
References: <mubcg.13522$fb2.853@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>
 <epcs4e.qb8.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> <tHkcg.6937$kR6.484@trnddc05>
 <0ugu4e.4i7.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
 <PkHcg.90575$Fs1.7198@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
 <To_cg.10095$S7.4017@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
 <%P_cg.155733$eR6.26337@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
 <pan.2006.05.24.15.48.07.783229@linuxchip.demon.co.uk.uk.uk>
 <ru0dg.156184$eR6.115957@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
 <pan.2006.05.24.17.53.03.81353@linuxchip.demon.co.uk.uk.uk>
 <2006052415345816807-gsande@worldnetattnet> <op.s92jl8t85afhvo@dogen>
 <5H9dg.10257$S7.8193@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
 <1319222.cHklMpk1fa@linux1.krischik.com>
 <inZdg.11939$S7.8565@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net 8yr2f9LTT1STvkfVqpRGgApCbFURQYLCGAE7tglCpXk/kUP2ON
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <inZdg.11939$S7.8565@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4575 comp.lang.fortran:10419
 comp.lang.pl1:1803
Date: 2006-05-29T13:46:03+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>>The review was only done for the Ariane 4 rocket.
> The report specifically states that the code was reviewed
> for Ariane 5, as I just described.

Quote, please. You've claimed this before, and it's not true.
I _have_ read the report - have you?

	Jan