From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,ed872c72866dab2b
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!noris.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:10:03 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110613 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: expression function bug or think?
References: 
 <678085105329914667.504682rmhost.bauhaus-maps.arcor.de@news.arcor.de>
 <87wrglwmao.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
 <4dfb168a$0$7608$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
In-Reply-To: <4dfb168a$0$7608$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4dfb19eb$0$7629$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 Jun 2011 11:10:03 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: ff734911.newsspool1.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=@QA=bDNk6Fmf1oJaJ0@dmgic==]BZ:afn4Fo<]lROoRa<`=YMgDjhgb8V6?4Fa=5gkPCY\c7>ejVh]6e7R_Z_47hg3\KO13LUQa
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19910
Date: 2011-06-17T11:10:03+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 6/17/11 10:55 AM, Georg Bauhaus wrote:
>           when others =>
>              [constraint_error when
>                not (n - 1 >= 0)
>                "range check failed"]
>              [constraint_error when
>                not (n - 2 >= 0)
>                "range check failed"]
>              return natural(functions__fib2 (n - 1) + functions__fib2 (n -
>                2));

This looks like a suitable place for the range checks.
Maybe they are being been move upwards for case statements
the way Adam has described?