From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c4cb2c432feebd9d X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,c4cb2c432feebd9d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid1094ba,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Vorbr=FCggen?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran Subject: Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 18:38:50 +0200 Organization: MediaSec Technologies GmbH Message-ID: <4de7npF1aaq50U2@individual.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net 27PvIQEkdtoHKcowOuNHKwfUNBR8Ji8CtJzBS/W/f1zbhaHAhA User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en In-Reply-To: Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4342 comp.lang.fortran:10080 Date: 2006-05-22T18:38:50+02:00 List-Id: > It is clear that > > A*B > > is easier to read and understand than > > MATMUL(A,B) > > would you not agree? I definitely disagree. Is that operator meant as the matrix multiplication, the outer product, element-wise multiplication, or something else that has the mathematical properties of a group? Jan