From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a9bab26b6fe54a36
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!195.71.90.67.MISMATCH!news.unit0.net!noris.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 14:18:28 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Pondering what rationale behind record type
References: 
 <e49186b6-9c80-4788-a64f-dd9aba151f02@u26g2000vby.googlegroups.com>
 <90148303-4dc4-4c05-882f-88dd69a95494@z13g2000prk.googlegroups.com>
 <92quueFnsfU1@mid.individual.net> <vpiu4ewfl8vf.1np1y27so5jtb.dlg@40tude.net>
 <defadb27-a92e-43a4-ae34-b399ee84e266@d28g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
 <4dc864b9$0$6890$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <srmjrvuvt6co.1salemwyup26.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4dc90f7a$0$7659$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <11dlfbvj00hru$.7zkw6im0a7gj$.dlg@40tude.net>
In-Reply-To: <11dlfbvj00hru$.7zkw6im0a7gj$.dlg@40tude.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4dc92d14$0$6776$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 May 2011 14:18:29 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 08ce3612.newsspool3.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=e6XadD;lZ1H=8m7nZkdN^@McF=Q^Z^V3H4Fo<]lROoRA8kF<OcfhCOKK=BPK4hl>2Nnc\616M64>JLh>_cHTX3jMdF:I=D;PcPM
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19215
Date: 2011-05-10T14:18:29+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 10.05.11 14:08, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:

>> Anything wrong with (i.e. makes you shudder)
>>
>>    Label_A: loop
>>      ...
>>    end loop Label_A;
>>
>> ?
> 
> loop A do
>    ...
> end A;

Consequently,

if ... then A do
   ...
else
   ...
end A;

I guess?

>>    type Get_Token is function (File : File_Type) return
>>        ((Matched : Boolean; Length : Positive) record
>>            case Matched is
>>              when True => Token : String (1..Length);
>>              when False => null;
>>            end case;
>>         end record)
>>    end Get_Token;
> 
> No, Get_Token would be a function-type.

Yes. It was suggested that the meat part of type declarations
should end in "end [X]", not "end keyword", so that

> E.g.

    type Func is
       function (X : Float) return Float;
    end Func;