From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,a9b0810d3106d9b8 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!weretis.net!feeder5.news.weretis.net!news-peer.in.tum.de!news.belwue.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:00:03 +0200 From: Georg Bauhaus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Fun with C References: <27cf3992-4132-4483-9110-adc7a089cd4a@e8g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <54108d8d-4e7c-4901-bd5e-819d27720d48@a11g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <4daa8fc6$0$7652$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <37428a21-61b4-4cdf-9897-7b84252f8fce@a11g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <4dab6906$0$6893$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <57a1fa4b-4730-41a8-be8a-82061ef9dc22@x37g2000prb.googlegroups.com> <4daca6ba$0$6773$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <33973ba6-c390-4af1-9116-6facb12e2878@u12g2000vbf.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <4db55433$0$6771$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Apr 2011 13:00:03 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: ea315895.newsspool3.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=[2:n1^ZS0ekf1oJaJ0@dmgMcF=Q^Z^V3h4Fo<]lROoRa8kFejVhAD=4nEB4j9`>^M=Idf1H[n X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:20017 Date: 2011-04-25T13:00:03+02:00 List-Id: On 4/25/11 1:06 PM, Paul Colin Gloster wrote: > It was suspected in John R. Anderson; and Robin Jeffries, "Novice LISP > Errors: Undetected Losses of Information from Working Memory", > "Human-Computer Interaction", Volume 1, 1985 that people can > successfully learn to overcome minor problems, but when they later are > trying to solve harder problems then they make simple mistakes which > they had already learnt to not make. The impact of typos and other glitches seems a most interesting criterion for error classification and how a language facilitates ease of checking. > Anyway, the C example explicitly involved int and unsigned int and > there is no guarantee that int is signed int though it is with > many compilers. That int is signed is defined by the language C, I think. C99, ยง 6.2.5