From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ddf5660e3e8010b1
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!news-transit.tcx.org.uk!feeder.news-service.com!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 23:13:48 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ada commercial options
References: 
 <5f171139-8296-4c7c-bc24-02885eadd260@dr5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
 <op.vt5c71iqlzeukk@jellix.jlfencey.com>
 <77c9c293-9fd3-4f3b-a754-83bf3d3be487@p16g2000vbi.googlegroups.com>
 <ionpv7$f7t$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.1104210935070.1184@medsec1.medien.uni-weimar.de>
 <4DB08C52.2090309@obry.net>
In-Reply-To: <4DB08C52.2090309@obry.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <4db09e0c$0$7670$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 Apr 2011 23:13:48 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 04a6eab2.newsspool1.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=I4;a:5>kgo2TQL:hoD@>T?ic==]BZ:af>4Fo<]lROoR1<`=YMgDjhg2B_QmXYGIhN8PCY\c7>ejV8e[0_KkfSTL4Ahc7BVeK^h7
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:19938
Date: 2011-04-21T23:13:48+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 4/21/11 9:58 PM, Pascal Obry wrote:
> Le 21/04/2011 10:08, stefan-lucks@see-the.signature a �crit :

>>    2. Avoid gnat-specific libraries.
>
> That's not a problem. At some point AWS was compiled under GNAT and
> Aonix compiler. I had just copied some GNAT packages (GNAT.Regexp, and
> some others) from GNAT and compiled them with Aonix compiler.

Since these libraries aren't GNAT specific, then,
would it be o.K. to place them in a subsystem
whose name sounds a little less GNAT specific? :-)

Like PAL, or GNU, or ...

(Other GNAT.* packages really are GNAT specific in that
they use implementation defined attributes, for example,
and cannot be compiled with other Ada compilers.)