From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,a9b0810d3106d9b8 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!209.197.12.246.MISMATCH!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit3.readnews.com!s09-10.readnews.com!not-for-mail Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:43:46 -0400 From: Hyman Rosen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Fun with C References: <27cf3992-4132-4483-9110-adc7a089cd4a@e8g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <3ccf18a2-ba10-42bc-aeab-9368749961fb@a11g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <4c2b6a58-e3b6-47da-95e0-64853be5c1f9@v11g2000prb.googlegroups.com> <86748003-860f-4729-ae26-55be1e58ac2b@d27g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <4b5748dc-60fa-4cec-a317-054626e9a1ca@d19g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <1908th3tyz101.1f6c5w8t9mggy.dlg@40tude.net> In-Reply-To: <1908th3tyz101.1f6c5w8t9mggy.dlg@40tude.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <4db06d5b$0$26801$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 51fa4666.usenet-news.net X-Trace: DXC=g4>:KR`E\\`36dX[YAVR8i^oXGM_6\KV`mX0AG3X_jUol[no5jA:fFeVjKk:Lk^BNacR12TN^Bg7n^nCF;`RekEk49_3]^;dLdl X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenet-news.net Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18956 Date: 2011-04-21T13:43:46-04:00 List-Id: On 4/21/2011 1:36 PM, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > C programmers are in majority simply because most > of programmers do think as they write. Why do you believe that Ada programmers do not also do that? I don't know Ada, but if I were to sit down to write an Ada program I would also write it as I was thinking, and would simply add and modify types and interfaces as needed. I expect I would also compile frequently and let the compiler tell me where I missed a spot and then just go and fix it up. In fact, it seems to me that Ada is more conducive to think-and-type than C is, because the compiler is better at telling you when you've gotten something wrong.