From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,69431b06fe9a3239
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!2a02:590:1:1::196.MISMATCH!news.teledata-fn.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:19:43 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How do I disable elaboration code on this
References: 
 <58bc4fb4-5f6a-48d6-9c98-0dde7ac619df@p16g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>
 <inq539$3tn$1@tornado.tornevall.net>
 <a439f669-3936-4c1c-8e76-2bb3bb63fce7@y31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>
 <4da2176e$0$6977$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <b8f74b18-815e-436d-876e-9aa7d47c6454@l6g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
 <93b20b91-03ed-48d2-87b6-a109127a5a4f@l18g2000yql.googlegroups.com>
 <m2vcyls3nl.fsf@pushface.org>
 <6bca8b26-152f-482c-95c0-1abf88b6b29b@a26g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <6bca8b26-152f-482c-95c0-1abf88b6b29b@a26g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4da2e3cf$0$6761$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Apr 2011 13:19:43 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: b489ab5f.newsspool3.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=UYA0V@=\N?kj5k5aEF7ISmMcF=Q^Z^V3h4Fo<]lROoRa8kF<OcfhCOk`F0@kn0Cb[bnc\616M64>jLh>_cHTX3jmMeL@6RaMidd
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:19726
Date: 2011-04-11T13:19:43+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 11.04.11 10:54, Lucretia wrote:
> The problem has nothing to do with the linker, I'm using binutils and
> gnat that I'e built myself. The problem is that GNAT is generating
> elaboration code where it is not allowed, i.e. code that 1)
> initialises  the array to 0 and 2) code that the copies function
> addresses into the array.

When, just for the fun of it, I added pragma Preelaborate,
I learned that Dummy'Address is non-static.

Assuming this could be helped by specifying the final
location of procedure Dummy in ROM, how would you do
this in C (as you said that's possible, I'm curious).