From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,92fea0e45d933ff4 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!noris.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 20:42:01 +0200 From: Georg Bauhaus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada sources MIME type References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <4d93797a$0$6878$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Mar 2011 20:42:02 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 5b3a5a0d.newsspool2.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=L5o06i:ZLh>_cHTX3j]`L_KHIQRPU_ X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:19580 Date: 2011-03-30T20:42:02+02:00 List-Id: On 30.03.11 19:40, Yannick DuchĂȘne (Hibou57) wrote: > promote a "text/x-ada-spec" and an > "text/x-ada-body" MIME types for Ada source files. Against. Though not against specifying file content's type and encoding! Use extended attributes. Available in all file systems and archives in current use. An Ada source file can contain multiple compilation units, and pragmas; what do you suggest if a single file has a spec, a body, a separate unit, and configuration pragmas, i.e. a complete Ada program text? That's why I'm against text/x-ada-* A MIME type should relate possible Ada content, not accidentals like a correspondence between compilation units and files the way a single compiler prefers.