From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7e8cebf09cf80560
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!noris.net!news.teledata-fn.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:01:31 +0100
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How would Ariane 5 have behaved if overflow checking
 werenotturned
 off?
References: 
 <a8387564-0835-467d-a461-60a093c38133@k15g2000prk.googlegroups.com>
	<op.vscizsqqlzeukk@jellix.jlfencey.com>
	<4d80b140$0$43832$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net>
	<op.vsf7vmtblzeukk@jellix.jlfencey.com>
	<4d814af0$0$43831$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net>
 <m2tyf2h9sp.fsf@pushface.org>
In-Reply-To: <m2tyf2h9sp.fsf@pushface.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4d81ea0b$0$6974$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 Mar 2011 12:01:32 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: e7a24c83.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=j=E]I6`^eT;kUFX=Y?aLP;4IUK<Cl32<14Fo<]lROoR18kF<OcfhCO;QAOO[X1i<C>nc\616M64>:Lh>_cHTX3j=S^VB;n3XB@<
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:19245
Date: 2011-03-17T12:01:32+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 17.03.11 01:26, Simon Wright wrote:
> "robin" <robin51@dodo.com.au> writes:
> 
>> But only if the error was hardware, which it wasn't.
> 
> No, and it wasn't bloody software either!!! it was SYSTEM DESIGN!!! and
> no amount of faffing about at the edges of software will ever fix that.
> 
> I'm out of this conversation.

Logic is open to more twisting by generalizing robin's rules:
by assuming that a defective system that includes hardware
can support a software error handler.  Come on, let's have
some more FUD from the many system engineers in the know,
in particular the one's not building Ariane systems.