From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,7e8cebf09cf80560 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!transit3.readnews.com!textspool1.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!postnews7.readnews.com!postbox2.readnews.com!not-for-mail Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:10:18 -0400 From: Hyman Rosen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110221 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How would Ariane 5 have behaved if overflow checking were notturned off? References: <4d80b140$0$43832$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <4d810172$0$4954$a8266bb1@postbox2.readnews.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <4d81273c$0$4910$a8266bb1@postbox2.readnews.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.186.190.52 X-Trace: 1300309820 postbox2.readnews.com 4910 198.186.190.52:53927 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18260 Date: 2011-03-16T17:10:18-04:00 List-Id: On 3/16/2011 5:04 PM, Shark8 wrote: > "Ignore it and continue operation" is, in a word, WRONG. I hope this is implemented on the flight software of the next airplane you fly on. On the contrary, ignore it and continue operation may be exactly the right thing to do, because the fault may be absorbed elsewhere and the system will continue to carry out its intended purpose.