From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,677963b1aa23e668 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!194.109.133.84.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:30:22 +0100 From: Georg Bauhaus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: What's stopping you from using Ada for your next commercial project? References: <4d78867e$0$23760$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <87r5afv0qa.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <4d78a96b$0$23753$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <4d78c3c6$0$23757$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <1wcgairebjd7m.1i237ckyxwpe5.dlg@40tude.net> In-Reply-To: <1wcgairebjd7m.1i237ckyxwpe5.dlg@40tude.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <4d78d26e$0$6880$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Mar 2011 14:30:22 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: 48f8230c.newsspool2.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=:I^R5:]bAN_<<0iRN7DLEQA9EHlD;3YcR4Fo<]lROoRQ8kFZLh>_cHTX3j]o0oZNRbidTT X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:19012 Date: 2011-03-10T14:30:22+01:00 List-Id: On 10.03.11 13:58, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: >> Yea, I wish I could afford it, but AFAIK AdaCore doesn't really cater to >> the SOHO crowd, which is sad for someone like me. :o) IIRC, they suggested that another support business could form around GMGPL GNAT or FSF GNAT. > Yes, this is IMO an error on the AdaCore's side. They underestimate the > leverage of low-end marked. They aren't the first. There were IBM, DEC, Sun > before them. But that is their decision... Comeaucomputing manages to produce a fine C++ compiler that uses another platform (C) compiler to produce executables. Maybe there's an idea. Duncan Sands had once started to combine GNAT and LLVM.