From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,677963b1aa23e668
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!diablo2.news.osn.de!news.osn.de!diablo2.news.osn.de!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!feed118.news.tele.dk!dotsrc.org!filter.dotsrc.org!news.dotsrc.org!not-for-mail
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:28:27 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Thomas_L=F8cke?= <tl@ada-dk.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101210 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What's stopping you from using Ada for your next commercial
 project?
References: 
 <fb3979d4-0335-474f-a62e-f71641969da8@p24g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>
 <dab11bae-5b63-485f-bdea-aa73f569e303@17g2000prr.googlegroups.com>
 <m2r5aguis4.fsf@pushface.org>
 <eec8247f-77e8-4f8a-9d2d-442b6211bf8f@i3g2000vby.googlegroups.com>
 <4d78867e$0$23760$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <ila1vh$d71$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In-Reply-To: <ila1vh$d71$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <4d78a7cb$0$23752$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
Organization: SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source
NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.91.213.86
X-Trace: news.sunsite.dk
 DXC=aA;U6HZXX>c5kL0JZ2<WfiYSB=nbEKnkk5DMU8coHF@l1GQX8;5?CngRED9SjB8:6iQo^8G8>Andm3IE6:3jl85caBPdSh0TI0d
X-Complaints-To: staff@sunsite.dk
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:19003
Date: 2011-03-10T11:28:27+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2011-03-10 09:26, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote:
> On 3/10/2011 12:06 AM, Thomas L�cke wrote:
>
>> Why add a bunch of new features, if the old ones still aren't fully
>> operational?
>>
>
> I think it is by 'law' that an ISO standard language needs to be
> updated every 5 or so years?
>
> Something to keep the language lawyers busy all the time :)


I surely hope that "keeping it updated" does not equal "forced to add
new features".

:o)

-- 
Thomas L�cke

Email: tl at ada-dk.org
Web: http//:ada-dk.org
http://identi.ca/thomaslocke