From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,677963b1aa23e668
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 16:06:44 +0100
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What's stopping you from using Ada for your next commercial
 project?
References: 
 <fb3979d4-0335-474f-a62e-f71641969da8@p24g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>
 <dab11bae-5b63-485f-bdea-aa73f569e303@17g2000prr.googlegroups.com>
 <4d778bf2$0$6977$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <slrninf36p.66u.localhost@example.org>
In-Reply-To: <slrninf36p.66u.localhost@example.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4d779784$0$6986$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 09 Mar 2011 16:06:44 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: d113b482.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=8JohIg_jI]7^cW`WBF>WQ<4IUK<Cl32<14Fo<]lROoR18kF<OcfhCO;4@W76Sief@=nc\616M64>:Lh>_cHTX3j=aF8>m<`W`:7
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17995
Date: 2011-03-09T16:06:44+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 09.03.11 15:21, localhost@example.org wrote:
>> Or about that in IBM Rational Ada?
> 
> Is Rational still selling and did they really support 2005? I checked a few
> years ago just on the Ada 95 and it was 35k dollars per seat.

http://www-01.ibm.com/software/awdtools/developer/ada/

Judging by what IBM employees have been doing (e.g.
leading the Ada 2005 standardization effort) and
saying (e.g. about working on Ada.Containers, IIRC),
it seems fair to assume that Rational Ada has not been
entirely frozen at Ada 95.

Pascal Leroy has been mentioning large, long term customers.