From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,677963b1aa23e668
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!feeder.erje.net!news.osn.de!diablo2.news.osn.de!noris.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:17:22 +0100
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What's stopping you from using Ada for your next commercial
 project?
References: 
 <fb3979d4-0335-474f-a62e-f71641969da8@p24g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>
 <dab11bae-5b63-485f-bdea-aa73f569e303@17g2000prr.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <dab11bae-5b63-485f-bdea-aa73f569e303@17g2000prr.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4d778bf2$0$6977$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 09 Mar 2011 15:17:22 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 4c1d86b3.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=KHjN>Tk]f2[aAeROF2PWMQ4IUK<Cl32<Q4Fo<]lROoRQ8kF<OcfhCO[VP?0TCfN=kUnc\616M64>ZLh>_cHTX3j]\ESFmONaVHY
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17991
Date: 2011-03-09T15:17:22+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 09.03.11 09:58, Maciej Sobczak wrote:
> On 8 Mar, 23:23, Lucretia <Lucretia9...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> 
>> I'm just wondering what it would take for a company to choose Ada as
>> their next implementation language?

> 3. Availability of reasonably robust and up to date compilers.
> Unfortunately things are very bad for Ada in this regard - compilers
> are either bug-ridden or outdated.

What do you think about Ada 2005 support in SofCheck's compiler?
Or about that in IBM Rational Ada?