From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f15b862e11b575a4
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!novia!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!postnews7.readnews.com!not-for-mail
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 10:09:58 -0500
From: Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110221 Thunderbird/3.1.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Air traffic control system in Java
References: <4d6ffe16$0$17930$a8266bb1@postbox2.readnews.com>
 <op.vrsc8moilzeukk@jellix.jlfencey.com>
 <4d7007ba$0$17957$a8266bb1@postbox2.readnews.com>
 <013c0489-e4b3-46d1-a700-8110cd1fb0f6@18g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <013c0489-e4b3-46d1-a700-8110cd1fb0f6@18g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4d74f55e$0$28752$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 6308de3b.usenet-news.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=>5BeV75Q<5RC3?BJ\<]\aXQFZ3T]GPM]WmX0AG3X_jU_@jbhdN]B:kWVjKk:Lk^BNQcR12TN^Bg7^iLTSFSnaTl]hLM4AV6SE9Z
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenet-news.net
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:18915
Date: 2011-03-07T10:09:58-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 3/7/2011 7:26 AM, jimmaureenrogers@worldnet.att.net wrote:
>>> Hyman Rosen wrote:
>>
>>
>>       In this paper we present a new multiprocessor garbage collector
>>       that achieves maximum measured pause times of 2.6 milliseconds
>>       over a set of eleven benchmark programs that perform significant
>>       amounts of memory allocation.
>>
>
> The real time systems I work on cannot spare a random 2.6 milliseconds
> of processing time.

But I expect that air traffic control systems can.