From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6e3f191debc78584
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!194.25.134.126.MISMATCH!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 21:54:00 +0100
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm-host.bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110123 Thunderbird/3.1.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Can Ada be hacked?
References: 
 <215154cd-f0bf-4138-b294-776d4e058592@o30g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
	<2561745b-7720-470d-a6ee-67f1d0e8cff0@v11g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
	<4d6cdadd$0$23762$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
	<a7e01020-9e32-4930-8afb-8455bc181583@r17g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
	<4d6d34fa$0$27111$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>	<4D6D3745.3010302@obry.net>
	<4D6D38FA.8050207@obry.net>
	<4d6d8187$0$7666$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <20110304201543.22361668.tero.koskinen@iki.fi>
In-Reply-To: <20110304201543.22361668.tero.koskinen@iki.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <4d715168$0$6985$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 04 Mar 2011 21:54:01 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68465b43.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=XIa23b3jJLK2jYf>V4L0gL4IUK<Cl32<A4Fo<]lROoRA8kF<OcfhCOKZRJjBmi>ei@PCY\c7>ejVHRb>^e;]TfjGnDOMiKidIIK
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17840
Date: 2011-03-04T21:54:01+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 3/4/11 7:15 PM, Tero Koskinen wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 00:30:15 +0100 Georg Bauhaus wrote:
>> Indeed, anything currently being developed around HTML 5 and
>> Web 2.0 is no less than an operating system.  Not kidding.
>> Google is developing a Javascript compiler(*).  It should not
>> come as a surprise when sooner or later Google Chrome will have
>> a Javascript byte code interpreter and/or JIT compiler.
>
> Google already has a JIT compiler in their V8 Javascript engine:
> http://code.google.com/intl/fi/apis/v8/design.html#mach_code
>
> And Firefox has two different JIT compilers:
> TraceMonkey: https://wiki.mozilla.org/JavaScript:TraceMonkey
> and J�gerMonkey: https://wiki.mozilla.org/JaegerMonkey
>

Ha.  I feel old.

Now the we only need byte code streams sent via HTTP.
Wasn't there a company, named Sun or some such, trying
to bring byte code classes into the net?  Never mind.