From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c9d5fc258548b22a
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!novia!news-out.readnews.com!postnews7.readnews.com!not-for-mail
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 09:59:41 -0500
From: Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How do I write directly to a memory address?
References: 
 <67063a5b-f588-45ea-bf22-ca4ba0196ee6@l11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
 <31c357bd-c8dc-4583-a454-86d9c579e5f4@m13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
 <05a3673e-fb97-449c-94ed-1139eb085c32@x1g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
 <4d4c232a$0$28967$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <4D4D6506.50909@obry.net>
 <4d50095f$0$22393$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
 <wcck4hb95jz.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <4d6d56c4$0$11509$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <4D6D6A90.2090108@obry.net>
 <4d6d6e60$0$11509$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <ikk3nl$6fr$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <4d6e53c1$0$21954$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
 <94766542-d6cf-4191-bd28-2f8ba07a67db@e9g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <94766542-d6cf-4191-bd28-2f8ba07a67db@e9g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4d6e5b6f$0$21954$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: d4e592a2.usenet-news.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=LH=kH?[dOJdNj5J5Yk?5PgQFZ3T]GPM]gmX0AG3X_jUoEREK78_1jBkVjKk:Lk^BNacR12TN^Bg7n[3hNl4]a6JoYoLCIT2AA@e
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenet-news.net
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:18696
Date: 2011-03-02T09:59:41-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 3/2/2011 9:34 AM, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> OTOH, it is also true that interfacing Ada with a weakly-typed
> language such as SQL and C is just as error-prone as programming in
> SQL or C in the first place.

I don't understand or believe the claim that programming in SQL is
error-prone, whether directly or through an interface. I also don't
understand or believe the claim that SQL is weakly typed.

Can you explain?