From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,99210dd26e04d959
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!195.96.0.7.MISMATCH!newsfeed.utanet.at!newsfeed01.chello.at!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 22:10:05 +0100
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm-host.bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110123 Thunderbird/3.1.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Loops and parallel execution
References: 
 <ca880763-d1cb-4dde-96fa-1776eae86e95@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <ca880763-d1cb-4dde-96fa-1776eae86e95@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4d5aebac$0$7667$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Feb 2011 22:10:04 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: f22a01a4.newsspool1.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=iommd]YNBd>^cW`WBF>WQ<ic==]BZ:af>4Fo<]lROoR1<`=YMgDjhg2^ho\<72OWS?PCY\c7>ejV8Oo8A\k1Fc:92YYfT;Zc?^7
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:18262
Date: 2011-02-15T22:10:04+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2/15/11 12:27 AM, Tuck wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 5:47:00 AM UTC-5, Georg Bauhaus wrote:
>>   Is anything known yet
>> about what John Barnes's Integrate example would look like if
>> written in idiomatic ParaSail?
>
> It might look something like this:
>
>   function Integrate(
>     function Func(X : Floating is Float<>) ->  Floating;
>     Over : Interval<Floating>)
>       ->  Floating is
>     ...
>   end function Integrate;
>
>   ...
>
>   const Result := Integrate(Sin, Over =>  0.0 .. Pi/2.0);

Thanks, I must have overlooked nested declarations.
(Thought that one would have to make passing values
explicit;  thus using an outer function's argument
within another function local to the former would
have been ruled out. Doesn't seem so!)