From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,c9d5fc258548b22a
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!198.186.194.249.MISMATCH!transit3.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!postnews7.readnews.com!not-for-mail
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:28:41 -0500
From: Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How do I write directly to a memory address?
References: 
 <67063a5b-f588-45ea-bf22-ca4ba0196ee6@l11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
 <4d52b489$0$19486$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
 <9a8njlwvey1p.1a96yvvgdf6yu.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4d52c5e5$0$19486$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
 <720b7e8f-1ae2-4b3b-851e-12b08b3c99e0@r4g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
 <4d52dd97$0$18057$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
 <9a8f406d-05ca-4bf3-8487-918d4e0dd634@o18g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
 <4d52ee47$0$18057$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
 <e1076cab-2a7e-4762-acf4-80bf807614bf@n16g2000prc.googlegroups.com>
 <4d5306a0$0$18057$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
 <76c123ab-7425-44d8-b26d-b2b41a9aa42b@o7g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
 <4d5310ab$0$18057$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
 <9bff52ca-6213-41da-8fa4-3a4cdd8086d3@y36g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
 <4d5315c8$0$18057$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
 <op.vqnqhtodlzeukk@jellix.jlfencey.com>
 <4d531a54$0$18057$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
 <86a277d4-d0a2-428a-aee2-1f8ac159cf76@n16g2000prc.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <86a277d4-d0a2-428a-aee2-1f8ac159cf76@n16g2000prc.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4d5404c9$0$27423$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: aad0fa37.usenet-news.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=MfUE8@\]njOnP7CiUV6\OHQFZ3T]GPM]GmX0AG3X_jUO3Cb99N\mXADVjKk:Lk^BNAcR12TN^Bg7N9]h<J`FB]OB>ck9n8BlIoC
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenet-news.net
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17215
Date: 2011-02-10T10:28:41-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2/9/2011 7:16 PM, Shark8 wrote:
> No, there are some errors in C that are flatly impossible
> within Ada;

You're illustrating my point. It's typical of language wars that
one side will pick a perceived problem in the other language that
they believe has been fixed by their own, and then focus on that
to demonstrate that their own language is perfect.