From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c9d5fc258548b22a X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!198.186.194.249.MISMATCH!transit3.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!postnews3.readnews.com!not-for-mail Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:21:22 -0500 From: Hyman Rosen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How do I write directly to a memory address? References: <67063a5b-f588-45ea-bf22-ca4ba0196ee6@l11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <737a6396-72bd-4a1e-8895-7d50f287960e@d28g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <4d5008a5$0$6879$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <4d5031fe$0$6765$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <1f229967-d3cf-42b6-8087-c97ee08652f3@i40g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <4d51169e$0$7657$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <1bnp0pw1c8r5b$.guxc48qweiwe.dlg@40tude.net> <4d51a1c0$0$19486$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <4d51b568$0$19486$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <4d51bd75$0$19486$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <4d52e2fb$0$18057$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <4d52e934$0$18057$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: c18281e4.usenet-news.net X-Trace: DXC=U1;eH5gbh66]9SVRDPiC62^oXGM_6\KV0mX0AG3X_jU?<^JMhOhjP4>VjKk:Lk^BN1cR12TN^Bg7>CKIHCW3N^V4OiaDcmXlf@5 X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenet-news.net Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:18105 Date: 2011-02-09T14:21:22-05:00 List-Id: On 2/9/2011 1:59 PM, Vinzent Hoefler wrote: > And your macro subtracts one from the bit number. No, from the ordinal :-)