From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c9d5fc258548b22a
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!198.186.194.249.MISMATCH!transit3.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!postnews7.readnews.com!not-for-mail
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 13:39:40 -0500
From: Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How do I write directly to a memory address?
References: 
 <67063a5b-f588-45ea-bf22-ca4ba0196ee6@l11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
 <31c357bd-c8dc-4583-a454-86d9c579e5f4@m13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
 <05a3673e-fb97-449c-94ed-1139eb085c32@x1g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
 <iimmvm$tsp$1@news.eternal-september.org> <8r86vgFc3uU1@mid.individual.net>
 <iimrem$udn$1@news.eternal-september.org>
 <19fh1chm74f9.11cws0j5bckze.dlg@40tude.net>
 <fa33fca1-c95b-4558-8a4c-7b3276366ffc@m13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
 <4d516394$0$29394$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
 <bbea804f-94db-4ec4-85d7-7b0a1e30c3ab@n36g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
 <4d517a70$0$29394$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
 <4d518c73$0$7664$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
In-Reply-To: <4d518c73$0$7664$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4d518e89$0$19486$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 22ea0a79.usenet-news.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=1CUTklHg7FF6_61RZFo^NCQFZ3T]GPM]GmX0AG3X_jUOHL[6Z1g^FC@VjKk:Lk^BNAcR12TN^Bg7N:KNd2lZeh5Li1WZZ``>cDD
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenet-news.net
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17013
Date: 2011-02-08T13:39:40-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2/8/2011 1:33 PM, Georg Bauhaus wrote:
> On 08.02.11 18:13, Hyman Rosen wrote:
>
>> Then don't write large routines.
>
> Is there evidence that a mechanism necessary for combining
> the smaller routines leads to fewer errors?  I'd like to
> believe this if its statistically true.

I was just joking, as the rest of the post should have made clear.