From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,bba1d22efb2b9a43 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-18 01:28:28 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: chris.m.moore@amsjv.com (Chris Moore) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Opengl and extension Date: 18 Sep 2002 01:28:27 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <4d14ed0e.0209180028.78163d1b@posting.google.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 20.138.254.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1032337708 31321 127.0.0.1 (18 Sep 2002 08:28:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Sep 2002 08:28:28 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:29101 Date: 2002-09-18T08:28:28+00:00 List-Id: Stephen Leake wrote in message news:... > I suspect libopengl32.a is simply a binding to the Win32 OpenGL DLL; I > don't see why it would return different results via C. Very odd. Unless the C version links against, say, the NVIDIA implementation. Chris Moore