From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,a996db867563769d X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.141.40.65.MISMATCH!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 22:04:43 +0100 From: Georg Bauhaus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101129 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: A few questions on Ada and Ada implementations References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <4d0e736c$0$6874$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Dec 2010 22:04:44 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: 8b3175d8.newsspool2.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=I@_dTM3[LT285[]]\]T081A9EHlD;3Yc24Fo<]lROoR18kFiPO\@S49mQEB049=:87aK?8kaS\P92iaW[kQRj36 X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:17019 Date: 2010-12-19T22:04:44+01:00 List-Id: On 12/19/10 12:21 AM, Kulin Remailer wrote: > What Ada toolchains are available for 64 bit Linux that can be used to > generate 32 or 64 bit Linux/UNIX executables that are in a hobbyist's price > range (let's say up to 1000 USD). The Windows edition of Aonix/Atego's ObjectAda compiler used to be in this range for non-big-project use. (Not sure about word size.) Maybe they can arrange for a GNU/Linux edition, too, if you explain the matter. AdaMagic by SofCheck might be available on similar terms, provided you don't want a support contract. (It produces C as the backend language, ironically; word size might thus depend on what the C compiler will produce.) > Do they include their own GUI libraries? ObjectAda has typical traditional Unix GUI bindings, I think, but I don't know first hand. > Basically I want to know what kind of investment I need to make to have an > unencumbered Ada95 toolchain with all the features I need to write and > deploy general applications without having to go fishing for libraries. All compilers I know are available on licensing terms and conditions. Almost none requires that your sources will have to be made available to recipients of your binaries, including FSF GNAT's.