From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7332b19c66a79eea
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:51:04 +0100
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Quantified Expressions: "some"
References: <4ce31bb6$0$7670$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <2d44ff4d-b3ad-4593-8492-4d16fb6b6a2e@j2g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
 <1t7pvrh3i022d.8t9yqjonagar$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <C909757A.152E%news@findlayw.plus.com>
 <g15thsvf8vhu$.1pw6yv0xvdazy$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4ce3e3c3$0$6987$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <k6l7qqa0e8wi$.b1w0f4ni0xug$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <ic0v1b$qf9$1@news.eternal-september.org>
 <puezn7v9naom.1nrc5rh8wzm7p.dlg@40tude.net> <ic1uin$nge$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <13vas9njbsmps.1npsunlgz5n4z$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <949be87b-78a2-4e7b-8b38-40f57a69eb55@d20g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>
 <8kknp7FkqpU1@mid.individual.net>
In-Reply-To: <8kknp7FkqpU1@mid.individual.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4ce54b69$0$7656$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Nov 2010 16:51:05 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 35ddbb8d.newsspool1.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=c@VbY0nh0oBFJ3]dH>I?oEic==]BZ:afN4Fo<]lROoRA<`=YMgDjhgB`^X5QCGVNoCnc\616M64>JLh>_cHTX3jM0IkAjn9I_nM
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:16557
Date: 2010-11-18T16:51:05+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 18.11.10 14:24, Niklas Holsti wrote:

>> Use a colon or double colon:
>>
>> ( for all X in 1 | 3..5 | F'Range :: P(X) )
> 
> I like that. The double-colon is visually more apparent than '|' and there is
> no risk of confusion with the earlier and other meanings of "=>". A single
> colon could also work, if we don't want to add new lexemes.
> 

Ad double colon, ::, adds to confusion if you work cross-language.