From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d00514eb0749375b
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!volia.net!news2.volia.net!feed-A.news.volia.net!news.musoftware.de!wum.musoftware.de!news.weisnix.org!newsfeed.ision.net!newsfeed2.easynews.net!ision!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:19:29 +0100
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: initialize an array (1-D) at elaboration using an expression
 based on the index?
References: <i9amkr$goj$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <op.vkm4yasm0k3wt7@jellix.jlfencey.com>
 <4b8f7f06-a817-4545-9fc6-67740c67b9d3@a4g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
 <4cdaad27$0$6979$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <82e746ff-a4eb-4570-8016-78930977def1@35g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
 <4cdb41db$0$6980$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <wccoc9wqd9w.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
In-Reply-To: <wccoc9wqd9w.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4cdbfb71$0$6988$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Nov 2010 15:19:29 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66b2cc0a.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=1I6<h5<[X>@A<A_d>@P]\D4IUK<Cl32<A4Fo<]lROoRA8kF<OcfhCOKVk>BP8GT\nDnc\616M64>JLh>_cHTX3jM3>EQQ9P>cJI
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:16406
Date: 2010-11-11T15:19:29+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 11.11.10 13:02, Robert A Duff wrote:
> Georg Bauhaus <rm-host.bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de> writes:
> 
>>    Jobs : array (Job_Id) of T := (others => Make);
>>
>> works, where construction function Make advances Job_Id
>> values for T's discriminant internally.
> 
> The calls to Make can happen in any order.  So every task
> gets a unique job id, but the N'th element of Jobs does
> not necessarily have job id N.

Ouch, yes. Though it had not mattered in my particular case,
expressly ordering construction parameters makes a (for ...)
loop or similar look even more desirable---for the static
case.