From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e55245590c829bef X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed-0.progon.net!progon.net!news-zh.switch.ch!switch.ch!news.belwue.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 20:35:02 +0100 From: Georg Bauhaus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Beginners question: Compound types, how-to? References: <86wroy58ff.fsf@gareth.avalon.lan> <86pqup5xfy.fsf@gareth.avalon.lan> <86y69d3rec.fsf@gareth.avalon.lan> <4cd19583$0$6977$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <82oca54q8a.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <4cd27fb2$0$7658$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <8239re1jp2.fsf@stephe-leake.org> In-Reply-To: <8239re1jp2.fsf@stephe-leake.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <4cd5ade6$0$6990$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 06 Nov 2010 20:35:02 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: fd00c969.newsspool4.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=9<=JW>7_bR\5TOT9_N5iejVX>04UAl;^ X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15347 Date: 2010-11-06T20:35:02+01:00 List-Id: On 11/6/10 5:49 PM, Stephen Leake wrote: > Because when you are writing a general purpose library, there is no > specific context. > > A list package can be used in many different contexts. The package > should be named Lists (or Gen_Lists if it is generic), the type should > be named Lists.List, the subprogram arguments should be named List. I find this description of a List type to be perfectly listing the specifics. > What more is there to say? Nothing. :-) > Like I said, not actually solving the problem, only providing for > endless discussion. You said earlier that you have see a solution of a problem to have the same value as its dissolution. I guess, then, we should settle on different view of the Gordian Knot and on what Alexander did using his _Type sword. Georg