From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,e55245590c829bef
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!kanaga.switch.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!switch.ch!newsfeed-0.progon.net!progon.net!newsfeed.ision.net!newsfeed2.easynews.net!ision!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 10:41:06 +0100
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm-host.bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Beginners question: Compound types, how-to?
References: <86wroy58ff.fsf@gareth.avalon.lan>
 	<iale5p$2f6$1@tornado.tornevall.net> 	<86pqup5xfy.fsf@gareth.avalon.lan>
 	<becbd7a4-89e6-4d81-b7d8-7d18ac75c1f9@j2g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
 	<86y69d3rec.fsf@gareth.avalon.lan> 	<ian4b2$p9h$1@tornado.tornevall.net>
 <op.vlibn4shule2fv@garhos>
 	<Xns9E25839F7A0A1WarrensBlatherings@81.169.183.62>
 	<4cd19583$0$6977$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 	<op.vllvhwbf0k3wt7@jellix.jlfencey.com> <82oca54q8a.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
In-Reply-To: <82oca54q8a.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4cd27fb2$0$7658$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 04 Nov 2010 10:41:06 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2cc5a0cd.newsspool1.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=FQ=330`>UAZmG86`U=_nC_ic==]BZ:af^4Fo<]lROoRQ<`=YMgDjhgRI3?B2M?cZ7WPCY\c7>ejVXQQfIKUEA2ZW7E85IXfTEZV
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:16177
Date: 2010-11-04T10:41:06+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 11/4/10 6:23 AM, Stephen Leake wrote:

Why is it that the "_type"  camp is so consistently silent
about giving specific contexts of what are just programming
examples?

> Notice that the "find a better name" camp always suggests _several_
> names, and each person suggests _different_ ones. That means there is no
> common solution, and the resulting code will be confusing, and subject
> to endless arguments about "the right name" in code reviews.

The "find a better name" camp only suggests several names in order
to offer ideas, as best as they can not knowing the context
like the programmers do---or are supposed to do.

The programmers or team can pick the one name that matches best.
Only they have enough domain knowledge to choose properly.