From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e276c1ed16429c03
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!194.25.134.126.MISMATCH!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 22:57:15 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm-host.bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada is getting more popular!
References: <i93mac$73v$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <4cc71e08$0$23758$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
 <alpine.LNX.2.00.1010271051280.20224@Bluewhite64.example.net>
 <4cc87d7a$0$23755$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <op.vk85a5ivule2fv@garhos>
 <4cc912e1$0$23761$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
 <19rlit851kct1$.db26uwez2yg7$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4cc94547$0$23752$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
 <i904ghveib4a.1nhkwbzed3fkv.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4cc9bf12$0$23765$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
 <15lnc6vv8z3hc$.1oi6i03umest8$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <871v7aqcpq.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
 <13rgisoyxwkb2$.1dpflsd9zyiz5.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4cca091e$0$7655$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <4h6j3lfp7x5l.zqrg45o56ci3$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4cca9195$0$6978$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <87hbg46mcz.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
 <4ccc1681$0$6776$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <878w1fy3lb.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
 <4ccc6bb9$0$6977$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <1moioblnrwu6j$.lryvrdcvl543.dlg@40tude.net>
In-Reply-To: <1moioblnrwu6j$.lryvrdcvl543.dlg@40tude.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4ccc86ab$0$7669$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Oct 2010 22:57:15 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 85438c1d.newsspool1.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=0?U9_^>T6knFXUDVUnEXQmic==]BZ:afn4Fo<]lROoRa<`=YMgDjhgbgJjA2iN6XifPCY\c7>ejVh;Bi1XSQ]b4i8aMU?RVZ4Cb
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:15961
Date: 2010-10-30T22:57:15+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 10/30/10 9:26 PM, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 21:02:17 +0200, Georg Bauhaus wrote:
>
>> So standards production costs money.  Who is going to pay?
>
> Who should pay for laws? Who does not mathematical theorems?
>
>> If the answer is tax payers, then who is going to decide
>> which standard deserves what amount of tax payers' money?
>
> Which law does deserve money? There are things, which cannot and may not be
> sold.
>
> There was enough money for the laws about curved cucumbers and bent
> bananas.

And?