From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,233c88e0e480e0b
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!kanaga.switch.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!switch.ch!news.belwue.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:33:57 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101013 Thunderbird/3.1.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT/GCC and -fstack-check
References: <op.vk5ejve7ule2fv@garhos> <op.vk53d1sjule2fv@garhos>
 <op.vk53x7siule2fv@garhos> <87ocahqt0a.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
 <op.vk6bw7ozule2fv@garhos>
 <147518c6-4492-41dd-aec9-18f3ca084656@j25g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <147518c6-4492-41dd-aec9-18f3ca084656@j25g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4cc702f6$0$6770$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Oct 2010 18:33:58 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: f3a419f7.newsspool3.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=9;l37EGLQ@^[7Non7UCi8UMcF=Q^Z^V3X4Fo<]lROoRQ8kF<OcfhCO[HAQJ;JMblF]nc\616M64>ZLh>_cHTX3j]PEjAmk\>m0W
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14803
Date: 2010-10-26T18:33:58+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 26.10.10 17:11, Ludovic Brenta wrote:

> http://gcc.gnu.org/PR43013
> 
> Read the comments from Eric Botcazou...

Hm.. Maybe this means that with GNAT 4.6, we can again hope
to use larger stack allocated objects again?