From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,8701dd61403f6aa6 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!u7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: adacrypt Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: A Newbie to the group. Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:14:25 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <4c8bb2bf-0fa2-4d2c-b6bc-d7b081d9c922@u7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> References: <26d9422f-e704-458b-a6eb-c7ec70a28ba7@q12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.151.237.229 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1276625665 25863 127.0.0.1 (15 Jun 2010 18:14:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:14:25 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: u7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.151.237.229; posting-account=pmkN8QoAAAAtIhXRUfydb0SCISnwaeyg User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; GTB6.5; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:12738 Date: 2010-06-15T11:14:25-07:00 List-Id: On Jun 15, 6:29=A0pm, Yannick Duch=EAne (Hibou57) wrote: > Le Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:43:49 +0200, adacrypt = a =A0 > =E9crit:> Could I ask you to vist my websitehttp://www.adacrypt.comabd ha= ve a > > look at " A New Approach to Cryptography" - this is attracting alot of > > interest by academic visitors. > > Just thanks > > -- > There is even better than a pragma Assert: a SPARK --# check. > --# check C and WhoKnowWhat and YouKnowWho; > --# assert Ada; > -- =A0i.e. forget about previous premises which leads to conclusion > -- =A0and start with new conclusion as premise. Hi, I am a bit of a loss to interpret your meaning - Do you mean I should promote this as something of academic interest to the refernces you give me or is there some mistake on my part - I would appreciate it if you enlighten me a bit - adacrypt