From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8d7393f07c06c5e9
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!198.186.194.249.MISMATCH!transit3.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!postnews3.readnews.com!not-for-mail
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:03:31 -0400
From: "Peter C. Chapin" <chapinp@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Another question about fixed point types.
References: <4c7991c8$0$2375$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net>
 <62f49eaf-ed47-47c7-a13a-96ca5750b4e8@y11g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
 <4c7a44d1$0$2390$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net>
 <fe942a67-b3f8-4195-bf7e-6e10201cb715@i13g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
 <4c7a6d04$0$2390$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net>
 <5bb7f0f6-b9f1-42ee-a092-44cc781618d0@f6g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <5bb7f0f6-b9f1-42ee-a092-44cc781618d0@f6g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4c7ad979$0$2372$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net>
Organization: SoVerNet (sover.net)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 6460474d.news.sover.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=ekn3;fj9?DFSHGN<7KP`INK6_LM2JZB_C2h<^iA^CNJA:WUUlR<856O=DU^ib7>mmL5_o9m90h9=D
X-Complaints-To: abuse@sover.net
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13832
Date: 2010-08-29T18:03:31-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2010-08-29 13:50, Phil Thornley wrote:

> It's all about completing the proofs of overflow checks - where the
> Simplifier needs to know the range of the base type.  Up to and
> including version 8.1.1 of last year, it was optional whether to
> include these checks when VCs were generated for run-time checks
> (generated only if you used the -exp qualifier for the Examiner).  But
> in the recent 2010 version the overflow checks have become mandatory
> and can't be turned off.

Thanks, this is good to know.

Peter