From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,5c1125c290d9dd14 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!87.79.20.105.MISMATCH!news.netcologne.de!ramfeed1.netcologne.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 01:51:42 +0200 From: Georg Bauhaus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ANN: Ada 2005 Math Extensions, 20100810 release References: <15e1x67lls1pe$.sqnhbm59hwdz$.dlg@40tude.net> <1bldu3ohbyo31.1sua9ji5uysyy$.dlg@40tude.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <4c672c0e$0$6760$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Aug 2010 01:51:43 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 933c4a9c.newsspool3.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=RQIlXYhb;0nf1oJaJ0@dmgMcF=Q^Z^V3h4Fo<]lROoRa8kFejVhcT6A8^jOkThNIS7lJ On 8/14/10 9:18 PM, Simon Wright wrote: > Jeffrey Carter writes: > >> On 08/14/2010 10:16 AM, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: >>> >>> Only after you wrote it I became aware that this is a grammar issue. "may I >>> end a sentence with a preposition" gives 2,580,000 results in Google. >>> People are running polls. Wow! >> >> As someone once said on the subject, "That is something up with which >> I will not put." >> >> Ending a sentence with a preposition, along with split infinitives and >> double negatives, are things that were quite common and acceptable >> before the 19th century. In the 19th C logicians came up with these >> rules that were contrary to common usage, and they were adopted by >> like-thinkers, but the real rule is that they are perfectly natural >> usage. > > Quite. But Foo_Of is *not* natural! Being east of GMT, too, I believe I understand Dmitry's intent. I'd replace the "inverted possessive construct with implicit whole" with one of your suggestions, e.g., and feel a lot better, even though my native language isn't English. generic type Fur is private; package Mechanical_Dog is --subtype Fur_Of is Fur; -- eastern pidgin? subtype Its_Fur is Fur; subtype Dogs_Fur is Fur; subtypeFormal_Fur is Fur; subtype Actual_Fur is Fur; subtype Fur_Type is Fur; subtype Generic_Fur is Fur; Georg