From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5c1125c290d9dd14
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!news.musoftware.de!wum.musoftware.de!news.weisnix.org!newsfeed.ision.net!newsfeed2.easynews.net!ision!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 09:42:15 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm-host.bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ANN: Ada 2005 Math Extensions, 20100810 release
References: <m2lj8eywqo.fsf@pushface.org> <m2bp98n82h.fsf@pushface.org>
 <xjlthhyt5ugw.w2yg0t26s4ak.dlg@40tude.net> <m239ujfwde.fsf@pushface.org>
 <15e1x67lls1pe$.sqnhbm59hwdz$.dlg@40tude.net>
In-Reply-To: <15e1x67lls1pe$.sqnhbm59hwdz$.dlg@40tude.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4c64f756$0$6985$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 13 Aug 2010 09:42:14 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: f9f68e17.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=<0W9P`I10@VAX0F2i><W:S4IUK<Cl32<Q4Fo<]lROoRQ8kF<OcfhCO[ZRJjBmi>eiPPCY\c7>ejVX]9[eb:];nRZLeB0UTi;0oQ
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13203
Date: 2010-08-13T09:42:14+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 8/13/10 8:27 AM, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:

> Another rule of thumb (I don't know if this is going to be fixed in Ada
> 2012), is that a child should always rename formal generic arguments in its
> specifications. Under certain circumstances, usually in children, they
> might become unavailable. I mean this:

Would you mind showing an example of a name that is needed
but unavailable?

> generic
>     with package P is new Generic_P (<>);
> package Generic_S is
>     package P_Of renames P; -- You will need this!