From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2a34b7ad6c6a0774
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news.netcologne.de!ramfeed1.netcologne.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:37:31 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Efficiency of code generated by Ada compilers
References: <f3c0cf89-6993-4b83-b4fe-8a920ce23a14@f6g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
 <op.vg77swroxmjfy8@garhos> <i3sl3v$1ogj$1@news.ett.com.ua>
 <op.vg8wtnzoule2fv@garhos> <op.vg8xan2hule2fv@garhos>
 <8cf0fkF60rU1@mid.individual.net> <i3u38h$2d0b$1@news.ett.com.ua>
In-Reply-To: <i3u38h$2d0b$1@news.ett.com.ua>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4c62998b$0$7661$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Aug 2010 14:37:31 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: ca924d41.newsspool1.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=gM[nnTG;gUi^Y=RbYBPl4`ic==]BZ:afn4Fo<]lROoRa<`=YMgDjhgb834lQIi\\i`nc\616M64>jLh>_cHTX3jmhUaGRi:oA_d
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13117
Date: 2010-08-11T14:37:31+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 11.08.10 13:58, anon@att.net wrote:

> Since, all Ada compilers except for GNAT and IBM are still using Ada 83 or 
> 95 standard the "pragma Suppress ( identifier [ , [ On => ] name ] ) ;" 
> statement is still valid.  

The AppletMagic compiler (using the AdaMagic front end) has let me see
some hints to Ada 2005 features a few years ago.  So I think it is safe
to assume that AdaMagic supports Ada 95, and Ada 2005 to some extent.
(Another possible hint is, I think, its being used in a current project
in Britain IIRC, an embeeded one. Someone reported here, recently.)


Georg