From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,334f9012742e58fc
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!novia!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!postnews3.readnews.com!not-for-mail
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 19:20:41 -0400
From: "Peter C. Chapin" <pcc482719@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Thunderbird/3.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Gnat GPL 2010 available soon (conditional expressions)
References: <2010061621145016807-sjs@essexacuk>
 <op.veihbktxnfgb3u@richard.piraten.dd>
 	<0fa4c574-9539-492f-8514-d32c68beb22a@w31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
 	<1frrgtpa5dycl$.12kl72iqsg3dx$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4c270613$0$6974$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 	<1wuwvzgwlwgli$.1birkinieia0d$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <f1a86f31-598c-4cb1-a60e-011da55f5feb@x27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
 	<1ur19ais2ejih.mjbgdsv9pr66.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4c275562$0$6987$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 	<4c276114$0$2378$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net> <i0dhh3$qh7$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <5b469d9a-49b1-4859-87bc-66202adc3d48@i31g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <5b469d9a-49b1-4859-87bc-66202adc3d48@i31g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4c2bd0d2$0$2379$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net>
Organization: SoVerNet (sover.net)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 6d38a17b.news.sover.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=kf8d915@_XcDL5CI7;683jK6_LM2JZB_cM0oeLNI4Khi:WUUlR<856o?ElA@ZV1bKkhB[FHVVGh=f
X-Complaints-To: abuse@sover.net
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:13035
Date: 2010-06-30T19:20:41-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2010-06-30 00:09, Gautier write-only wrote:

> I can imagine - and probably it will be usual to come across code
> like :
> 
> X( (if Condition_a then Expression_1a else Expression_2a) ):=
>   Y( (if Condition_b then Expression_1b else Expression_2b) );
> 
> with Condition_b involving X and Condition_a involving Y, for
> instance... mmmh!

That wouldn't be any weirder than, for example

X(Y(I + 1)) := Y(X(J - 1));

I don't see how conditional expressions would make such examples any worse.

Peter