From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.182.230.168 with SMTP id sz8mr796851obc.9.1383305026831;
        Fri, 01 Nov 2013 04:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.182.61.51 with SMTP id m19mr19422obr.30.1383305026667; Fri,
 01 Nov 2013 04:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!i2no4655545qav.0!news-out.google.com!9ni3876qaf.0!nntp.google.com!i2no4655544qav.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 04:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <lyk3gsse68.fsf@pushface.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=150.101.201.124;
 posting-account=pBdvJAoAAAAbTiQ-L1tpxD99i_UttsrJ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 150.101.201.124
References: <d843d1e1-a1ea-4818-b23d-aff833be2186@googlegroups.com>
 <lyk3gsse68.fsf@pushface.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <4c0ed099-c746-406e-9f04-1623fa0655dd@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT: Why does a large 'new' allocation blow the stack when an
 initialiser is present ?
From: Rod Kay <rodakay@internode.on.net>
Injection-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 11:23:46 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:17574
Date: 2013-11-01T04:23:46-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Friday, 1 November 2013 19:45:51 UTC+11, Simon Wright  wrote:
> 
> I'm not sure what "=> <>" is expected to do when there's no default
> 
> value; I added "with Default_Component_Value => 42" to Integer_Array,
> 
> and The_Array_1 (0) was 42 but The_Array_2 (1) was unchanged at 0!


Howdy,

   Yes, somewhat odd. I'd thought (well, assumed) that if <> was used and no default value exists, then no initialisation takes place.


   I also tried ...

    := new Integer_array' (1 .. 10_000_000 => 5); 

   ... tho with no change in the result.