From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6609c40f81b32989
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,9bdec20bcc7f3687
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 101deb,e67cdb1dcad3c668
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: 
 gida07f3367d7,gid8d3408f8c3,gidbda4de328f,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!news.weisnix.org!newsfeed.ision.net!newsfeed2.easynews.net!ision!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 09:13:19 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm-host.bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
 rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Thunderbird/3.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.pl1
Subject: Re: Why is Ada considered "too specialized" for scientific use
References: <hp95j8$i29$1@speranza.aioe.org>
   <4bba8bf1$0$56418$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net>
 <4bbb2246$8$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net>
 <4bbb5386$0$56422$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net>
 <m2tyrnjc5f.fsf@pushface.org> <4bbdf5c6$1$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net>
 <f5a9304e-e6eb-40b2-8944-a6ca4bc92b1b@q15g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
 <4c0a2e36$0$34205$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net>
 <4c0b234f$1$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net>
 <nospam-C84D27.10531806062010@earthlink.us.supernews.com>
 <hugkq9$u0t$1@speranza.aioe.org> <hugt0812ccm@news2.newsguy.com>
 <7plPn.6395$z%6.5719@edtnps83>
In-Reply-To: <7plPn.6395$z%6.5719@edtnps83>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4c0ded8f$0$6759$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 08 Jun 2010 09:13:19 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69faec03.newsspool3.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=`nOoL\gmNgc:i=48;n?Z:`McF=Q^Z^V3h4Fo<]lROoRa8kF<OcfhCOkN6RRM@5:Z?lPCY\c7>ejVh`JSe5SiiBKdP8j@b8QkOGa
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:12430 comp.lang.fortran:26501
 comp.lang.pl1:1533
Date: 2010-06-08T09:13:19+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 6/8/10 8:27 AM, James J. Weinkam wrote:

> Nevertheless, it remains true that the assembly language programmer who
> knows what he is about has complete control over the binary code
> generated, although I would venture to say that few, if any, assembly
> language programmers think of what they are doing in those terms most of
> the time.

Would this control include control over pipelines, parallelism,
and possibly translation of assembly instructions to microcode?