From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: bda4de328f,e67cdb1dcad3c668
X-Google-Attributes: gidbda4de328f,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.exosphere.de!news.swapon.de!news.lindneronline.de!news.uni-stuttgart.de!news.belwue.de!kanaga.switch.ch!switch.ch!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!usenetcore.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!216.196.98.150.MISMATCH!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.posted.lerostechnologies!news.posted.lerostechnologies.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 06:11:00 -0500
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.pl1
From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spamtrap@library.lspace.org.invalid>
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 00:25:51 -0400
Subject: Re: Why is Ada considered "too specialized" for scientific use
References: <hp95j8$i29$1@speranza.aioe.org>
      <4bb9c72c$0$6990$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
      <pan.2010.04.05.20.51.46.20000@none.net>
      <4bba8bf1$0$56418$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net>
      <4bbb2246$8$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net>
      <4bbb5386$0$56422$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net>
      <m2tyrnjc5f.fsf@pushface.org>
      <4bbdf5c6$1$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net>
      <f5a9304e-e6eb-40b2-8944-a6ca4bc92b1b@q15g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
      <4c0a2e36$0$34205$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
Organization: Atid/2
X-CompuServe-Customer: Yes
X-Coriate: interspeed.co.nz
X-Ecrate: tanandtanlawyers.com
X-Pose: George Cox
X-Punge: Micro$oft
X-Sanguinate: The MVS Guy
X-Terminate: SPA(GIS)
X-Tinguish: Mark Griffith
X-Treme: C&C,DWS
X-WebTV-Stationery: Standard; BGColor=black; TextColor=black
Message-ID: <4c0b234f$1$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net>
X-Newsreader: MR/2 Internet Cruiser Edition for OS/2 v3.00.11.18 BETA/60 
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.103.155.4
X-Trace: 
 sv3-BXePkqClI58X/H1uEke+ExAbG9r92tDwHt49e4wddmQJ1537o2nYe8R4cYqHM9F2iTlfGfiL0FKQxmW!Cz21LlFcFHTy800OZPCFfhxXJUNILVNryBv/gX9iJFXWl6099VarGQXMgmL8z1jiCmifPalD9cg3!cTNNuanft5by09MqusKCejAG8zlzJZQB
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2744
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:12320 comp.lang.fortran:26381
 comp.lang.pl1:1482
Date: 2010-06-06T00:25:51-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In <4c0a2e36$0$34205$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net>, on 06/05/2010
   at 08:58 PM, Dave Frank <robin51@dodo.com.au> said:

>Of course, the programs were in machine code.

Your saying "of course" does not make it true, or even plausible. You
keep refusing to actually provide evidence, or even independent
claims. The last time you cited something that you claimed to have
been written in machine language it turned out to have been written in
assembler.

-- 
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT  <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>

Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action.  I reserve the
right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail.  Reply to
domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me.  Do not
reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org