From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,PLING_QUERY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,b6d862eabdeb1fc4 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!uucp.gnuu.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 09:47:48 +0200 From: Georg Bauhaus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada noob here! Is Ada widely used? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <4c0a0124$0$7656$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 05 Jun 2010 09:47:48 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 3438154e.newsspool1.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=Ec:FGbjMUJ7nBOkdL^Lo7>ic==]BZ:af>4Fo<]lROoR1<`=YMgDjhg2`^X5QCGVNo3PCY\c7>ejV85Y;B@e>M^4?I:Wl^1n]nj? X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11297 Date: 2010-06-05T09:47:48+02:00 List-Id: On 6/4/10 9:23 PM, Fritz Wuehler wrote: > Ada is better than COBOL except in one way. It is easier to write reports > (the bulk of financial processing) and define decimal (money) fields in > COBOL than Ada. It *could* have been used in financial processing, but > COBOL had two decades and a half of a head start. How do Interfaces.COBOL and Ada.Text_IO.Editing fit in here?