From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,23c0de5a42cf667e
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!news.k-dsl.de!news.uni-stuttgart.de!news.belwue.de!newsfeed.ision.net!newsfeed2.easynews.net!ision!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 15:53:13 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
 rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT packages in Linux distributions
References: <j5e1x31qvn1b$.11ywrjmshtauz$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <op.vcgi9oqzule2fv@garhos> <w1q9e75h9kzi.4p81vh3kannn$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <op.vch6dsqmxmjfy8@garhos> <16bz9kvbqa8y9$.155ntpwpwl29d.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4be97bea$0$2966$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr> <op.vcjtnsp5xmjfy8@garhos>
 <quqkqeas8pu2$.1w5pelct29juv.dlg@40tude.net>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005121017020.21749@medsec1.medien.uni-weimar.de>
 <1p87qdlnjbufg.127laayhrw9x3$.dlg@40tude.net> <op.vclocqp9ule2fv@garhos>
 <4j73xhgimt6r$.pu55kne2p2w5$.dlg@40tude.net> <op.vc93x5wlule2fv@garhos>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005261013510.12488@medsec1.medien.uni-weimar.de>
 <op.vda8oshlule2fv@garhos>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005261455260.26620@medsec1.medien.uni-weimar.de>
 <C822DB5C.14492D%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005271422490.30605@medsec1.medien.uni-weimar.de>
 <C8244CA5.144C62%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk> <op.vdpfdcgoxmjfy8@garhos>
 <C82D718E.145A9E%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <4c09047d$0$6976$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
In-Reply-To: <4c09047d$0$6976$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <4c090549$0$6976$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 04 Jun 2010 15:53:13 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: c846ea46.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=lJkN8ZPI>W@E4ZB2flKORA4IUK<Cl32<A4Fo<]lROoRA8kF<OcfhCOK`j1\C0LA?dBnc\616M64>JLh>_cHTX3jMRR_9B1naAGB
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:12251
Date: 2010-06-04T15:53:13+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 04.06.10 15:49, Georg Bauhaus wrote:
> On 03.06.10 15:49, (see below) wrote:
>> On 03/06/2010 04:16, in article op.vdpfdcgoxmjfy8@garhos, "Yannick Duch�ne
>> (Hibou57)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>>
>>> Le Thu, 27 May 2010 17:21:57 +0200, (see below)
>>> <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk> a �crit:
>>>> My experience is that CS/SE students always focus on "coding" at the
>>>> expense
>>>> of problem analysis, program design, project planning, verification,
>>>> validation, documentation, and anything else they find less congenial.
>>> I always though this was not so much with these students. So why do they
>>> choose it if they are not aware of what it requires ?
>>
>> They are aware. That makes no difference.
> 
> Coding invariables makes me think of a tricky(?) question:
         invariably

(Must not think of tricky questions while writing...)