From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,8147e9052e4bc0df
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!uucp.gnuu.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 18:45:09 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
 rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: -gnatN breakage was: Child vs nested package : efficiency matter
References: <op.vdgww3flxmjfy8@garhos>
 <37b699c4-da76-4b5f-9074-0aa465af4a19@v12g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
 	<op.vdmn7kl4ule2fv@garhos> <m2ljay60c3.fsf@pushface.org>
 <op.vdmx9cngxmjfy8@garhos> 	<hu5ea8$6il$2@news.eternal-september.org>
 <11039f0d-ee37-4c99-ad4b-ab2ed658d553@m21g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <11039f0d-ee37-4c99-ad4b-ab2ed658d553@m21g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4c068a95$0$6760$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 02 Jun 2010 18:45:09 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: ef675674.newsspool3.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=PYbY2JA1F3H=8m7nZkdN^@McF=Q^Z^V3H4Fo<]lROoRA8kF<OcfhCOKeC]MGCdWnWInc\616M64>JLh>_cHTX3jMYGVM\dBk1bO
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:12203
Date: 2010-06-02T18:45:09+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 02.06.10 16:39, Vadim Godunko wrote:
> On Jun 2, 3:11 pm, "Alex R. Mosteo" <alejan...@mosteo.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> I've played with -gnatn and -gnatN in the past, and found that the latter
>> tends to bomb the compiler quite a lot. (GPL2008 and 2009 experiences).
>> Anyone seeing the same?
> 
> -gnatN is obsolete, you must use pragma Inline/Inline_Always with -
> gnatn instead.

Does this mean that 3rd party source cannot be
inlined across units unless GNAT specific pragma Inline_Always
is added to these 3rd party sources?