From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: bda4de328f,e67cdb1dcad3c668
X-Google-Attributes: gidbda4de328f,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin1!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!exi-transit.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!exi-spool.telstra.net!exi-reader.telstra.net!not-for-mail
From: "robin" <robin51@dodo.com.au>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.pl1
References: <hp95j8$i29$1@speranza.aioe.org>
       <4bb9c72c$0$6990$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
       <pan.2010.04.05.20.51.46.20000@none.net>
       <4bba8bf1$0$56418$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net>
       <4bbb2246$8$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net>
       <4bbb5386$0$56422$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net>
       <4bbbc752$2$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net>
       <4bc5a414$0$78577$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net>
 <4bc6e4c8$3$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net>
Subject: Re: Why is Ada considered  "too specialized" for scientific use
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 20:50:32 +1000
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3664
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3664
Message-ID: <4bed3524$0$67490$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 144.139.71.141
X-Trace: 1273836837 exi-reader.telstra.net 67490 144.139.71.141:1068
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:11604 comp.lang.fortran:25584
 comp.lang.pl1:1321
Date: 2010-05-14T20:50:32+10:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz" <spamtrap@library.lspace.org.invalid> wrote in message 
news:4bc6e4c8$3$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net...
| In <4bc5a414$0$78577$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net>, on 04/14/2010
|   at 07:32 PM, "robin" <robin51@dodo.com.au> said:
|
| >I already pointed out that important algorithms were first written in
| >machine code in the 1950s
|
| I know what you claimed; you have neither substantiated it nor shown its
| relevance to the points in dispute.

Here's another example.
Don Shell published his algorithm in machine code.
(A High-Speed Sorting Procedure, CACM, July 1959, p. 30-32.)