Re: for S'Image use Func??

[Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>]

On 07.05.10 14:21, Robert A Duff wrote:
> "J-P. Rosen" <rosen@adalog.fr> writes:

>>> I don't get it.  'Image isn't particularly helpful in producing
>>> columnar output.
>> 	
>> 'Image is just for quick, debug-like output.
> 
> So that's why it's broken?!
> 
> I'm imagining the Ada 83 design team saying, "This feature is
> only for quick, debug-like output, so let's make it do
> something annoying, so folks won't be able to use it
> for serious work, MWAHAHAH."  ;-)
> Sorry, I don't buy that -- I think they just made a mistake.

With 'Width given, and with 'Value reading "+123" like
" 123", WRT to what is there a mistake?
Would there be a discussion at all if "+123" had
been chosen as the result of 'Image (123)?


> I don't want nice formatted output.  I want the human-readable
> string image of the number, and for 123, that's "123",
> not " 123".

"123" to be the only representation ever wanted for 123 seems
like a far reaching assumption to me.  Others may want "+123" for
positive, "#123" for negative etc.   And "123" just *happens* to
be what one might want in this or that case.

I imagine that writing two statements for "just a number
and a string" makes some programmers feel annoyed because two
statements instead of one---though involving two functions---seems
verbose.

  Put (Num_Errors);
  Put_Line (" errors detected.");

"You never do such complicated things in Javascript's alert()"...
A way out:

  Put (Num_Errors); Put_Line (" errors detected.");