From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,6609c40f81b32989 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,9bdec20bcc7f3687 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,gid8d3408f8c3,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!feeder2.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!solnet.ch!solnet.ch!newsfeed.tiscali.ch!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 20:34:25 +0200 From: Georg Bauhaus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran Subject: Re: Why is Ada considered "too specialized" for scientific use References: <4bb9c72c$0$6990$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <4bbb3f22$0$7660$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <3bf0eb74-306c-48c4-b5ab-858d88b4079d@s9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <4bbe21b1$0$6759$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 08 Apr 2010 20:34:25 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 89d61965.newsspool3.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=0YVXd]DEo?FFJ3]dH>I?oEMcF=Q^Z^V3H4Fo<]lROoRA8kFejVH;1^90WJgkZASjkkZTnCL3O X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:10911 comp.lang.fortran:24562 Date: 2010-04-08T20:34:25+02:00 List-Id: On 4/8/10 6:40 PM, Warren wrote: > Speaking of 2005, I wouldn't mind acquiring a book on > the essential elements of the 2005 features in Ada, > [...] > > There must be a digestable summary on the net somewhere. > Resources? The Ada Rationale would be one such resource. http://www.adaic.org/standards/rationale05.html